No-Fault Decisions, October 2024

2 decisions · 2 Appellate Division

Issues this month: EUO no-show 1 Timeliness and preclusion 1 Discovery and procedure 1 Assignments and standing 1

Decisions

Appellate Division, First Department Oct 22, 2024 2024 NY Slip Op 05193 Insurer prevailed

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v Equinox Physical Therapy, P.C.

EUO notices mailed before receipt of the providers' no-fault verification forms are not subject to the 15-day period in 11 NYCRR 65-3.5. The Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed summary judgment for the insurer on its declaratory judgment causes of action. A claim specialist supplied affidavits concerning notices sent to the claimants' residences, and an attorney with personal knowledge established two EUO nonappearances through an affirmation and transcripts. Those nonappearances vitiated the policy, so the insurer did not need to establish timely claim denials. The providers failed to raise a factual issue or justify further discovery; their request rested on speculation, without an affidavit showing essential facts might exist but could not yet be stated under CPLR 3212 (f).

Appellate Division, Second Department Oct 2, 2024 2024 NY Slip Op 04792 Insurer prevailed

Sakandar v American Tr. Ins. Co.

An insurer's bad-faith failure to perform its contractual obligations does not support a separate tort cause of action. The Appellate Division, Second Department, reversed the order and granted the insurer's CPLR 3211 (a) motion dismissing the third, fourth and fifth causes of action. The injured claimant sought no-fault medical expenses and lost wages. The bad-faith claim failed because no separate tort existed. The General Business Law § 349 claim concerned a private insurance contract dispute, without consumer-oriented deceptive conduct aimed at the public. The no-fault contract claim failed because the claimant had assigned the right to benefits to the medical provider. The court did not reach the insurer's remaining contention.

All months

YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026 20 29 19 11 15 13 11 6 6 1 131
2025 6 11 13 6 16 6 8 6 5 7 11 19 114
2024 13 7 9 2 3 8 3 3 5 2 3 4 62
2023 2 9 12 5 7 8 6 2 8 5 2 7 73
2022 7 6 7 18 6 54 17 25 20 6 12 38 216
2021 2 16 6 19 28 15 25 6 8 10 8 23 166
2020 13 9 7 6 14 16 9 28 5 18 53 10 188
2019 13 9 57 28 60 14 34 48 4 76 35 59 437
2018 12 22 6 9 39 66 13 3 2 5 99 16 292
2017 16 16 17 30 15 12 40 33 68 28 35 154 464
2016 7 16 59 16 14 66 14 8 69 58 36 18 381
2015 4 14 44 16 44 13 26 30 27 15 54 23 310
2014 8 24 36 25 25 5 15 30 5 9 4 63 249
2013 16 33 24 14 33 15 20 20 5 34 32 24 270
2012 24 21 21 44 29 40 24 70 21 19 14 30 357
2011 22 11 21 23 18 19 25 16 11 51 19 62 298
2010 25 13 34 25 15 18 28 13 3 32 31 29 266
2009 19 18 22 29 22 38 44 5 4 14 11 22 248
2008 10 23 21 26 18 12 40 12 38 24 13 22 259
2007 25 43 57 23 25 18 16 20 23 20 20 16 306
2006 11 26 27 15 30 30 45 13 12 19 23 32 283
2005 10 26 39 31 13 19 22 13 10 19 11 19 232
2004 6 10 19 15 14 19 13 8 18 14 15 29 180
2003 1 4 4 14 23

Headnotes, outcome labels and monthly summaries are our own summaries, not the courts’ words; the decision itself is the authority. Months follow the date a decision was handed down; new decisions are added monthly, so a recent month can still grow.