No-Fault Decisions, April 2024

2 decisions · 1 Appellate Division · 1 trial court

Issues this month: Timeliness and preclusion 2 Policy issues 1 Discovery and procedure 1

Decisions

Appellate Division, Second Department Apr 3, 2024 2024 NY Slip Op 01801 Insurer prevailed

Jennings v Metropolitan Transp. Auth.

The injured claimant's no-fault claim was dismissed for untimely notice to the self-insurers without a clear and reasonable justification. The Appellate Division, Second Department, affirmed dismissal of the supplemental complaint under CPLR 3211 (a) (7). The pleading alleged that the claimant submitted a no-fault application more than 30 days after the bus accident. Under 11 NYCRR 65-2.4 (a) and (b), timely written notice or written proof of a clear and reasonable justification for delay was a condition precedent to an action against the self-insurers. The claimant's opposition submissions failed to demonstrate that such proof had been provided.

Trial court, First Department Apr 4, 2024 2024 NY Slip Op 50436(U) Insurer prevailed

State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v Atlantic Diagnostic, L.L.C.

An assignor who appears for an EUO must sign the transcript on request even if the insurer has not proved its EUO request timely. The Supreme Court, New York County, granted the insurer summary judgment against four provider assignees in its coverage action. Under 11 NYCRR 65-1.1 and binding First Department precedent, failure to sign and return the transcript breached a condition precedent to coverage, unaffected by denial untimeliness. Although the insurer had not established timely EUO scheduling, the assignor appeared with counsel, and signing enabled later evidentiary use. Mailing proof established failure to sign and return the transcript without contrary evidence. The court rejected prematurity under CPLR 3212 (f) because the providers had not pursued discovery responses, while expressing doubt about the binding coverage characterization.

All months

YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026 20 29 19 11 15 13 11 6 6 1 131
2025 6 11 13 6 16 6 8 6 5 7 11 19 114
2024 13 7 9 2 3 8 3 3 5 2 3 4 62
2023 2 9 12 5 7 8 6 2 8 5 2 7 73
2022 7 6 7 18 6 54 17 25 20 6 12 38 216
2021 2 16 6 19 28 15 25 6 8 10 8 23 166
2020 13 9 7 6 14 16 9 28 5 18 53 10 188
2019 13 9 57 28 60 14 34 48 4 76 35 59 437
2018 12 22 6 9 39 66 13 3 2 5 99 16 292
2017 16 16 17 30 15 12 40 33 68 28 35 154 464
2016 7 16 59 16 14 66 14 8 69 58 36 18 381
2015 4 14 44 16 44 13 26 30 27 15 54 23 310
2014 8 24 36 25 25 5 15 30 5 9 4 63 249
2013 16 33 24 14 33 15 20 20 5 34 32 24 270
2012 24 21 21 44 29 40 24 70 21 19 14 30 357
2011 22 11 21 23 18 19 25 16 11 51 19 62 298
2010 25 13 34 25 15 18 28 13 3 32 31 29 266
2009 19 18 22 29 22 38 44 5 4 14 11 22 248
2008 10 23 21 26 18 12 40 12 38 24 13 22 259
2007 25 43 57 23 25 18 16 20 23 20 20 16 306
2006 11 26 27 15 30 30 45 13 12 19 23 32 283
2005 10 26 39 31 13 19 22 13 10 19 11 19 232
2004 6 10 19 15 14 19 13 8 18 14 15 29 180
2003 1 4 4 14 23

Headnotes, outcome labels and monthly summaries are our own summaries, not the courts’ words; the decision itself is the authority. Months follow the date a decision was handed down; new decisions are added monthly, so a recent month can still grow.