No-Fault Decisions, November 2023

2 decisions · 2 trial courts

Issues this month: Declaratory judgment, res judicata 2 Interest and attorney fees 1 Policy issues 1 Discovery and procedure 1 Fraudulent incorporation (Mallela) 1

Decisions

Trial court, First Department Nov 27, 2023 2023 NY Slip Op 23362

Utica Mut. Ins. Co. v Crystal Curtain Wall Sys. Corp.

An insured owed a defense may recover fees after defeating an insurer's action challenging only indemnification. The Supreme Court, New York County, dismissed the insurers' declaratory judgment action under CPLR 3211 (a) (2), denied partial summary judgment, and awarded the insured contractors reasonable defense fees. Coverage for curtain-wall repair depended on unresolved facts in the underlying construction action, making relief unripe under CPLR 3001. The court dismissed without prejudice rather than imposing an indefinite stay. Applying U.S. Underwriters Ins. Co. v City Club Hotel, LLC, it concluded that the conceded duty to defend extended to the indemnification-only action and declined contrary federal authority. It did not reach the limitations defense or the objection that issue had not been joined.

Trial court, Second Department Nov 20, 2023 2023 NY Slip Op 51226(U) Split result

Renelique v Foremost Signature Ins. Co.

The insurer's renewed summary judgment motion based on a declaratory judgment was denied as untimely without good cause. The Civil Court, Queens County, applied CPLR 3212 (a) and alternatively rejected res judicata and collateral estoppel because the default order's finality and application to these claims were unestablished, as was deliberate nonparticipation. The provider established mailing, receipt, and overdue payment under CPLR 3212 (g), but its cross motion for summary judgment was denied because factual issues remained concerning licensing eligibility under 11 NYCRR 65-3.16 (a) (12). That defense was not subject to preclusion for untimely denial. The provider's request to dismiss the affirmative defense under CPLR 3211 (b) was denied without prejudice, and the matter was set for trial.

All months

YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecTotal
2026 20 29 19 11 15 13 11 6 6 1 131
2025 6 11 13 6 16 6 8 6 5 7 11 19 114
2024 13 7 9 2 3 8 3 3 5 2 3 4 62
2023 2 9 12 5 7 8 6 2 8 5 2 7 73
2022 7 6 7 18 6 54 17 25 20 6 12 38 216
2021 2 16 6 19 28 15 25 6 8 10 8 23 166
2020 13 9 7 6 14 16 9 28 5 18 53 10 188
2019 13 9 57 28 60 14 34 48 4 76 35 59 437
2018 12 22 6 9 39 66 13 3 2 5 99 16 292
2017 16 16 17 30 15 12 40 33 68 28 35 154 464
2016 7 16 59 16 14 66 14 8 69 58 36 18 381
2015 4 14 44 16 44 13 26 30 27 15 54 23 310
2014 8 24 36 25 25 5 15 30 5 9 4 63 249
2013 16 33 24 14 33 15 20 20 5 34 32 24 270
2012 24 21 21 44 29 40 24 70 21 19 14 30 357
2011 22 11 21 23 18 19 25 16 11 51 19 62 298
2010 25 13 34 25 15 18 28 13 3 32 31 29 266
2009 19 18 22 29 22 38 44 5 4 14 11 22 248
2008 10 23 21 26 18 12 40 12 38 24 13 22 259
2007 25 43 57 23 25 18 16 20 23 20 20 16 306
2006 11 26 27 15 30 30 45 13 12 19 23 32 283
2005 10 26 39 31 13 19 22 13 10 19 11 19 232
2004 6 10 19 15 14 19 13 8 18 14 15 29 180
2003 1 4 4 14 23

Headnotes, outcome labels and monthly summaries are our own summaries, not the courts’ words; the decision itself is the authority. Months follow the date a decision was handed down; new decisions are added monthly, so a recent month can still grow.