December 8, 2017
Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v ELRAC, Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 51714(U))
Headnote
Reported in New York Official Reports at Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v ELRAC, Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 51714(U))
[*1]| Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v ELRAC, Inc. |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 51714(U) [58 Misc 3d 127(A)] |
| Decided on December 8, 2017 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on December 8, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2014-2059 Q C
against
ELRAC, Inc., Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Carman, Callahan & Ingham, LLP (Jeffrey P. Saxon, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Richard G. Latin, J.), entered July 29, 2014. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the action was premature because plaintiff had failed to provide requested verification.
As plaintiff argues, the affidavit it submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion was sufficient to give rise to a presumption that the requested verification had been mailed to, and received by, defendant (see St. Vincent’s Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]). In light of the foregoing, there is a triable issue of fact as to whether the action is premature (see Compas Med., P.C. v Praetorian Ins. Co., 49 Misc 3d 152[A], 2015 NY [*2]Slip Op 51776[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]).
Accordingly, the order is reversed and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 08, 2017
Cited in this decision
Similar decisions
- Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v Hereford Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51641(U))
- Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51857(U))
- T & S Med. Supply Corp. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51453(U))
- Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51408(U))
- Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v ELRAC, Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 50826(U))