November 23, 2018
Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51689(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/nova-chiropractic-servs-p-c-v-geico-gen-ins-co-2018-ny-slip-op51689u/
- Decided
- November 23, 2018
- Citation
- 2018 NY Slip Op 51689(U) · 61 Misc 3d 145(A)
- Posture
- Trial
- Issues
- Trial and evidence
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51689(U))
| Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 51689(U) [61 Misc 3d 145(A)] |
| Decided on November 23, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on November 23, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2016-1055 K C
against
GEICO General Insurance Company, Appellant.
The Law Office of Printz & Goldstein (Lawrence J. Chanice of counsel), for appellant. Law Office Ilona Finkelshteyn, P.C. (Emilia I. Rutigliano of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Ingrid Joseph, J.), entered January 29, 2016. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $1,310.94.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.
At a nonjury trial of this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the sole issue was the medical necessity of the services in question. The Civil Court precluded the testimony of defendant’s expert witness and granted plaintiff’s motion for a directed verdict. Defendant appeals from the judgment that was subsequently entered in favor of plaintiff in the principal sum of $1,310.94.
For the reasons stated in Nova Chiropractic Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Miguel A. Vizcaino v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-1054 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed and the matter is remitted to the Civil Court for a new trial.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 23, 2018
Similar decisions
- Daily Med. Equip. Distrib. Ctr., Inc. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51691(U))The provider's judgment after exclusion of the insurer's expert at a medical-necessity trial was reversed and a new trial ordered.
- Complete Chiropractic, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50684(U))The provider's directed verdict on medical necessity was reversed after the insurer's substitute expert was excluded as hearsay.
- Sharp View Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51702(U))The provider's judgment after exclusion of the insurer's expert at a medical-necessity trial was reversed and a new trial ordered.
- Main St. Medcare, P.C. v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50686(U))The provider's directed verdict on medical necessity was reversed after the insurer's substitute expert was excluded as hearsay.
- Atlantic Chiropractic, P.C. v Geico Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51253(U))The provider's summary judgment was reversed because the insurer raised factual issues concerning timely denials and medical necessity.