March 31, 2010

Legion Ins. Co. v James (2010 NY Slip Op 50593(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/legion-ins-co-v-james-2010-ny-slip-op-50593u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
March 31, 2010
Citation
2010 NY Slip Op 50593(U) · 27 Misc 3d 128(A)
Posture
Default or vacatur
Issues
Defaults and vacatur
Cite as
Legion Ins. Co. v James, 27 Misc 3d 128(A), 2010 NY Slip Op 50593(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2010)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The defendant's motion to vacate the reinstated default judgment in the insurer's no-fault subrogation action was granted and affirmed. The Appellate Term, Second Department, found no abuse of discretion in the determination that the defendant had established a reasonable excuse and a meritorious defense, and noted the public policy favoring resolution of cases on the merits.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Legion Ins. Co. v James (2010 NY Slip Op 50593(U))

[*1]
Legion Ins. Co. v James
2010 NY Slip Op 50593(U) [27 Misc 3d 128(A)]
Decided on March 31, 2010
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on March 31, 2010

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : WESTON, J.P., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ
2009-937 Q C.
Legion Insurance Company a/s/o MILDRED GUZMAN, JOHN REYNA and BLANCA ZAMBRANO, Appellant,

against

David J. James, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Timothy J. Dufficy, J.), entered December 11, 2008. The order granted defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed without costs.

In this subrogation action to recover the amount plaintiff paid in no-fault benefits as a result of the injuries its insureds sustained in a motor vehicle accident, defendant failed to timely appear or answer and, in July 2002, a default judgment was entered against him. Thereafter, defendant moved to vacate the default judgment. Pursuant to a stipulation entered into in June 2007, the default judgment was vacated and defendant’s affidavit submitted in support of his motion was deemed his answer. The case was subsequently set down for trial, at which defendant failed to appear. The default judgment was thereafter reinstated. Defendant then moved to vacate the default judgment, which motion was granted by order entered December 11, 2008. The instant appeal by plaintiff ensued.

Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, we find that the Civil Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in determining that defendant established both a reasonable excuse for his default and a meritorious defense to the action. We note that public policy favors the resolution of cases on the merits (see Bunch v Dollar Budget, Inc., 12 AD3d 391 [2004]). Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

Weston, J.P., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur. [*2]
Decision Date: March 31, 2010

Similar decisions