May 18, 2018
Serge Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50742(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/serge-chiropractic-servs-p-c-v-ameriprise-ins-co-2018-ny-slip-op50742u/
- Decided
- May 18, 2018
- Citation
- 2018 NY Slip Op 50742(U) · 59 Misc 3d 145(A)
- Posture
- Summary judgment
- Outcome
- Provider prevailed
- Issues
- Policy issues
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Serge Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50742(U))
| Serge Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co. |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 50742(U) [59 Misc 3d 145(A)] |
| Decided on May 18, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on May 18, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2016-1704 K C
against
Ameriprise Ins. Co., Respondent.
Kopelevich & Feldsherova, P.C. (David Landfair of counsel), for appellant. Bruno, Gerbino & Soriano, LLP (Nathan Shapiro of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered May 11, 2016. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, with $30 costs, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint upon the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had procured the insurance policy in question by making a material misrepresentation as to his place of residence.
For the reasons stated in Liliya Veksler, LCSW, P.C., as Assignee of Carlos Canela v Ameriprise Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-1448 K C], decided herewith), the order is reversed, and defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 18, 2018
Similar decisions
- All Healthy Style Med., P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51651(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion based on an alleged material misrepresentation of the assignor's residence was denied on appeal.
- Liliya Veksler, LCSW, P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50741(U))The insurer failed to show that the assignor's residence misrepresentation was material to issuance of the policy.
- Serge Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50762(U))The insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's complaint was denied on appeal.
- Serge Chiropractic Servs., P.C. v Farmington Cas. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50698(U))The insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the claims based on the assignor's failure to appear for IMEs was upheld.
- Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Ameriprise Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51369(U))The insurer established the assignor's failure to attend both scheduled EUOs and timely denials based on that nonappearance.