June 19, 2012

Richard Denise M.D. P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth. (2012 NY Slip Op 04925)

Headnote

The transit authority's statutory obligation to provide no-fault benefits is subject to the three-year limitations period in CPLR 214 (2). Following M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., the Appellate Division, First Department, found the provider's claim time-barred. It reversed the Appellate Term's order, which had overturned the Civil Court's dismissal, granted the transit authority's motion to dismiss, and dismissed the complaint. The provider's remaining contentions were found unavailing.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Richard Denise M.D. P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth. (2012 NY Slip Op 04925)

Richard Denise M.D. P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth.
2012 NY Slip Op 04925 [96 AD3d 561]
June 19, 2012
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, August 1, 2012


Richard Denise M.D. P.C., as Assignee of Irene Trapp, Respondent,
v
New York City Transit Authority, Appellant.

—[*1] Jones Jones LLC, New York (Agnes Neiger of counsel), for appellant.

Israel, Israel & Purdy, LLP, Great Neck (Jennifer Greenhalgh Howard of counsel), for respondent.

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered July 22, 2009, which reversed an order of the Civil Court, Bronx County (Francis M. Alessandro, J.), entered on or about May 7, 2007, granting defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted, and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

Because defendant New York City Transit Authority’s obligation to provide no-fault benefits arises out of the no-fault statute, the three-year statute of limitations as set forth in CPLR 214 (2) bars plaintiff’s claim (see M.N. Dental Diagnostics, P.C. v New York City Tr. Auth., 82 AD3d 409 [2011]).

We have reviewed plaintiff’s contentions and find them unavailing. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Richter and Abdus-Salaam, JJ. [Prior Case History: 25 Misc 3d 13.]