December 22, 2017

Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51885(U))

Headnote

The court considered an appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, which denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The main issue decided was whether the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should be denied. The holding of the case was that the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51885(U))

Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51885(U)) [*1]
Renelique v Allstate Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 51885(U) [58 Misc 3d 142(A)]
Decided on December 22, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 22, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2015-1208 Q C

Pierre Jean Jacques Renelique, as Assignee of Tristan Griffith, Appellant,

against

Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Sweetbaum & Sweetbaum, Esqs. (Marshall D. Sweetbaum, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Terrence C. O’Connor, J.), entered April 20, 2015. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Renelique, as Assignee of Audley Noyan v Allstate Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-1180 Q C], decided herewith), the order is modified by providing that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 22, 2017