December 19, 2017

Masigla v Travelers Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51797(U))

Headnote

The court considered a case in which a provider was seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits. The main issue decided was whether the plaintiff had failed to appear for examinations under oath, leading to the granting of the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing several causes of action. The holding of the case was that the order, insofar as appealed from, was affirmed, with the court referring to a similar case for the reasons behind their decision.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Masigla v Travelers Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51797(U))

Masigla v Travelers Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51797(U)) [*1]
Masigla v Travelers Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 51797(U) [58 Misc 3d 134(A)]
Decided on December 19, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on December 19, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2015-307 Q C

Maria S. Masigla, P.T., as Assignee of Brumaire, Gastry, Appellant,

against

Travelers Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Joseph D. DePalma, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Aloy O. Ibuzor (William T. Angstreich, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Ulysses Bernard Leverett, J.), entered January 8, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, granted the branches of defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second through fifth and seventh through ninth causes of action.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment and defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiff appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of a January 8, 2015 order of the Civil Court as granted the branches of defendant’s cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the second through fifth and seventh through ninth causes of action on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for examinations under oath.

For the reasons stated in Masigla, as Assignee of Brumaire, Shimaine v Travelers Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2015-289 Q C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 19, 2017