• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
January 20, 2017

Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 50106(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/flatbush-chiropractic-p-c-v-american-tr-ins-co-2017-ny-slip-op50106u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
January 20, 2017
Citation
2017 NY Slip Op 50106(U) · 54 Misc 3d 135(A)
Posture
Motion to dismiss (CPLR 3211)
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
Discovery and procedure
Cite as
Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 54 Misc 3d 135(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 50106(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2017)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The insurer's motion to dismiss was granted, and the provider's cross motion to renew its summary judgment motion was denied. The Appellate Term, Second Department, affirmed both rulings for the reasons stated in the companion appeal decided the same day, No. 2015-1649 Q C, involving the same parties.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 50106(U))

[*1]
Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 50106(U) [54 Misc 3d 135(A)]
Decided on January 20, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on January 20, 2017

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : ELLIOT, J.P., PESCE and SOLOMON, JJ.
2015-1650 Q C
Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of JASPER BROOMES, Appellant,

against

American Transit Ins. Co., Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Terrence C. O’Connor, J.), entered May 6, 2015. The order granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to renew its prior motion for summary judgment, which had been denied by an order of the same court (Larry Love, J.) entered March 7, 2013.

ORDERED that the order entered May 6, 2015 is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for leave to renew its prior motion for summary judgment, which had been denied by an order of the same court (Larry Love, J.) entered March 7, 2013.

For the reasons stated in Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Pierre Luxio v American Tr. Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2016 NY Slip Op ___ [appeal No. 2015-1649 Q C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

Elliot, J.P., Pesce and Solomon, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: January 20, 2017

Similar decisions

  • Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51507(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion dismissing the provider's claims for failure to appear for EUOs was granted.
  • Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Hereford Ins. Co. (2015 NY Slip Op 51712(U))A lack-of-coverage defense is not precluded by defects in the insurer's denial or its timeliness.
  • Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v Omni Indem. Co. (2014 NY Slip Op 51235(U))The insurer established that the provider had sued the wrong carrier because another insurer had issued the policy covering the accident.
  • Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51489(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion dismissing the provider's claims for failure to appear for EUOs was granted.
  • BLR Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2012 NY Slip Op 50882(U))The insurer's peer review report and reviewing chiropractor's affidavit established lack of medical necessity, which the provider failed to rebut.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Case Law

  • Search
  • No-Fault AI
  • New Decisions
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Firm, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.