• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
  • Services
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Services
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
November 3, 2017

Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51489(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/restoration-chiropractic-p-c-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-co-2017-ny-slip-op51489u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
November 3, 2017
Citation
2017 NY Slip Op 51489(U) · 57 Misc 3d 147(A)
Posture
Summary judgment
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
EUO no-show
Cite as
Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 57 Misc 3d 147(A), 2017 NY Slip Op 51489(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2017)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The insurer's summary judgment motion dismissing the provider's claims for failure to appear for EUOs was granted. The Appellate Term, Second Department, affirmed the order for the reasons stated in the companion Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. appeal decided the same day, No. 2014-2172 K C.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51489(U))

[*1]
Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 51489(U) [57 Misc 3d 147(A)]
Decided on November 3, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 3, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2014-2127 K C

Restoration Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Carreras, Kevin, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. McDonnell & Adels, P.C., for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered July 17, 2014. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath.

For the reasons stated in Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C., as Assignee of Silface, Gala v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2017 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2014-2172 K C], decided herewith), the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 03, 2017

Similar decisions

  • Flatbush Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51495(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion dismissing the provider's claims for failure to appear for EUOs was granted.
  • Bronx Chiropractic Care, P.C. v State Farm Ins. (2019 NY Slip Op 50700(U))An insurer need not state objective reasons for requesting EUOs to establish entitlement to summary judgment based on nonappearance.
  • Kings County Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2016 NY Slip Op 51446(U))The insurer failed to prove the provider's EUO nonappearance through someone with personal knowledge.
  • Restoration Chiropractic, P.C. v 21st Century Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51656(U))The insurer's proof established proper mailing of EUO scheduling letters supporting its defense of the assignor's nonappearance.
  • Actual Chiropractic, P.C. v State Farm Ins. (2019 NY Slip Op 51552(U))An insurer need not set forth objective reasons for requesting EUOs to obtain summary judgment based on a provider's nonappearances.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Case Law

  • Search
  • No-Fault AI
  • New Decisions
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Firm, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.