August 9, 2019

EMC Health Prods., Inc. v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (2019 NY Slip Op 51317(U))

Headnote

The court considered the consolidation of three related actions for the purposes of disposition of the motion and the dismissal of the complaints in all three actions, based on the contention that the Civil Court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendant. The main issue decided was whether the Civil Court had personal jurisdiction over the defendant and if the consolidation and dismissal of the complaints was appropriate. The holding of the case was that for the reasons stated in a related case, the order to consolidate the actions and dismiss the complaints was affirmed.

Reported in New York Official Reports at EMC Health Prods., Inc. v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (2019 NY Slip Op 51317(U))

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

EMC Health Products, Inc., as Assignee of Kubi, George, Appellant,

against

Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Jeffrey G. Lerman, P.C. (Jeffrey G. Lerman of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Harriet L. Thompson, J.), entered April 19, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted defendant’s motion, in effect, to consolidate the above-entitled action with actions entitled EMC Health Prods., Inc., as Assignee of Boakye, Oheneba v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (Civ Ct, Kings County, index No. 68017/15) and EMC Health Prods., Inc., as Assignee of Smith, Eugene v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (Civ Ct, Kings County, index No. 68018/15) for the purposes of disposition of the motion and, upon consolidation, to dismiss the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved to, among other things, in effect, consolidate the instant action with two related actions entitled EMC Health Prods., Inc., as Assignee of Boakye, Oheneba v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (Civ Ct, Kings County, index No. 68017/15) and EMC Health Prods., Inc., as Assignee of Smith, Eugene v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (Civ Ct, Kings County, index No. 68018/15) for the purposes of disposition of the motion, and, upon consolidation, to dismiss the complaints in all three actions, contending that the Civil Court lacked personal jurisdiction over defendant. Plaintiff opposed the motion. Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court [*2]entered April 19, 2017 as consolidated the actions for the purposes of disposition of the motion and dismissed the complaint.

For the reasons stated in EMC Health Prods., Inc., as Assignee of Boakye, Oheneba v Maryland Auto. Ins. Fund (__ Misc 3d __, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-2137 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, J.P., PESCE and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: August 09, 2019