June 1, 2018
Pavlova v Country Wide Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50843(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/pavlova-v-country-wide-ins-co-2018-ny-slip-op-50843u/
- Decided
- June 1, 2018
- Citation
- 2018 NY Slip Op 50843(U) · 59 Misc 3d 151(A)
- Posture
- Summary judgment
- Outcome
- Insurer prevailed
- Later treatment
- Followed in 1 later decision (see Cited by)
- Issues
- Policy issues
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Pavlova v Country Wide Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50843(U))
| Pavlova v Country Wide Ins. Co. |
| 2018 NY Slip Op 50843(U) [59 Misc 3d 151(A)] |
| Decided on June 1, 2018 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on June 1, 2018
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2015-2980 Q C
against
Country Wide Insurance Company, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Jaffe & Koumourdas, LLP (Jean H. Kang of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Terrence C. O’Connor, J.), entered November 24, 2015. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had not issued an insurance policy covering the subject loss.
Contrary to plaintiff’s argument as to defendant’s cross motion, the proof submitted by defendant was sufficient to demonstrate that it had not issued a policy covering the subject loss (see e.g. New Way Med. Supply Corp. v Dollar Rent A Car, 49 Misc 3d 154[A], 2015 NY Slip Op 51794[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2015]; Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co., 44 Misc 3d 136[A], 2014 NY Slip Op 51240[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2014]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 01, 2018
Cited in this decision
- New Way Med. Supply Corp. v Dollar Rent A Car (2015 NY Slip Op 51794(U))The self-insurer's claims examiner affidavit established its lack-of-coverage defense without detailing each records-search step.
- Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2014 NY Slip Op 51240(U))The insurer's examiner affidavit established that it had not issued a policy covering the accident.
Cited by
A label shows how the later decision treated this one.
- SK Prime Med. Supply v Country Wide Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 51204(U)) FollowedThe insurer's underwriting affidavit established that it had issued no policy covering the accident, and the provider raised no triable issue.
Similar decisions
- Pavlova v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51634(U))The insurer's summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the provider's EUO nonappearance was affirmed.
- Pavlova v Allstate Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51061(U))The insured's EUO testimony and affidavit established that the alleged injury did not arise from an insured incident.
- Pavlova v Hartford Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50693(U))The insurer's attorney's affirmation established the provider's EUO nonappearance, and the insurer's proof supported proper mailing of the denial.
- Pavlova v Travelers Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51778(U))The provider's verification-mailing affidavit raised a factual issue as to whether its no-fault action was premature.
- Pavlova v Nationwide Ins. (2019 NY Slip Op 52056(U))The provider's motion to vacate default summary judgment dismissing its complaint was denied for lack of a reasonable excuse.