November 17, 2003
St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hosp. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2003 NY Slip Op 18448)
Headnote
Reported in New York Official Reports at St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hosp. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2003 NY Slip Op 18448)
| St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hosp. v American Tr. Ins. Co. |
| 2003 NY Slip Op 18448 [1 AD3d 498] |
| November 17, 2003 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
|
|
| St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital et al., Respondents, v American Transit Insurance Company, Appellant. |
—In an action to recover no-fault medical payments under two insurance contracts, the defendant appeals from (1) a decision of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Lally, J.), dated December 20, 2002, and (2) an order and judgment (one paper) of the same court entered January 29, 2003, which, upon granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, is in favor of the plaintiff St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital, as assignee of Francisco Martinez, and against it in the principal sum of $10,265.76 and is in favor of the plaintiff Westchester Medical Center, as assignee of Juan Saravio, and against it in the principal sum of $4,864.02.
Ordered that the appeal from the decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from a decision (see Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509 [1984]); and it is further,
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed; and it is further,
Ordered that one bill of costs is awarded to the plaintiffs.
In support of their motion for summary judgment, the plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by offering sufficient evidence to demonstrate the absence of a triable issue of fact (see Insurance Law § 5106 [a]; 11 NYCRR 65.15 [g] [3]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320 [1986]; St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co., 303 AD2d 743, 744 [2003]). In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. Altman, J.P., Florio, Luciano and Rivera, JJ., concur.
Cited by
- Mary Immaculate Hosp. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2004 NY Slip Op 02359)
- New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. (2004 NY Slip Op 08087)
- New York Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Queens v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2004 NY Slip Op 05626)
- A.B. Med. Servs. PLLC v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2005 NY Slip Op 50115(U))
- St. Vincent’s Hosp. of Richmond v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 52534(U))
- Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. v Physical Medicine & Rehab of NY (2011 NY Slip Op 50848(U))
- Maxim Orthopaedics PLLC v MVAIC (2026 NY Slip Op 51282(U))
- Medalliance Med. Health Servs. v Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 50737(U))
Similar decisions
- St. Barnabas Hosp. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 09585)
- St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hosp. v Blue Ridge Ins. Co. (2005 NY Slip Op 06666)
- New York & Presbyt. Hosp. v Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 01537)
- St. Vincent’s Hosp. & Med. Ctr. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2010 NY Slip Op 00668)
- Westchester Med. Ctr. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2005 NY Slip Op 03046)