November 13, 2020

Silver Lotus Acupuncture, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. (2020 NY Slip Op 51368(U))

Headnote

The insurer's proof established proper mailing of IME scheduling letters and the assignor's nonappearance at the scheduled IMEs. The provider appealed summary judgment dismissing its action for assigned first-party no-fault benefits on the IME nonappearance defense. The Appellate Term, Second Department, rejected the provider's challenges to the sufficiency of the mailing and nonappearance proof. Its remaining arguments were improperly raised for the first time on appeal and/or lacked merit. The order granting the insurer's motion was affirmed.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Silver Lotus Acupuncture, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y. (2020 NY Slip Op 51368(U))

[*1]
Silver Lotus Acupuncture, P.C. v Global Liberty Ins. Co. of N.Y.
2020 NY Slip Op 51368(U) [69 Misc 3d 143(A)]
Decided on November 13, 2020
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 13, 2020

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2018-2276 K C
Silver Lotus Acupuncture, P.C., as Assignee of Isaac Cochrane, Appellant,

against

Global Liberty Ins. Co. of NY, Respondent.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Darya Klein of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum, Esq.), for respondent (no brief filed).

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Michael Gerstein, J.), entered September 7, 2018. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs).

Contrary to plaintiff’s contentions, the record was sufficient to establish the proper mailing of the IME scheduling letters to plaintiff’s assignor (see St. Vincent’s Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]) and that plaintiff’s assignor had failed to appear for the scheduled IMEs (see Stephen Fogel Psychological, P.C. v Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., 35 AD3d 720 [2006]). Plaintiff’s remaining arguments are improperly raised for the first time on appeal and/or lack merit (see Parisien v Metlife Auto & Home, 54 Misc 3d 143[A], 2017 NY Slip Op 50208[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2017]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.



ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 13, 2020