• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
February 28, 2012

Rally Chiropractic, P.C. v MVAIC (2012 NY Slip Op 50325(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/rally-chiropractic-p-c-v-mvaic-2012-ny-slip-op-50325u/

Court
Appellate Term, First Department
Decided
February 28, 2012
Citation
2012 NY Slip Op 50325(U) ยท 34 Misc 3d 153(A)
Posture
Default or vacatur
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
Defaults and vacatur
Cite as
Rally Chiropractic, P.C. v MVAIC, 34 Misc 3d 153(A), 2012 NY Slip Op 50325(U) (App Term, 1st Dept 2012)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

MVAIC's compliance conference default was vacated because counsel's miscalendaring was excusable and was neither willful nor part of a delay pattern. MVAIC sought relief from a default judgment entered after it failed to appear at the conference. The providers did not argue that the delay caused prejudice or that MVAIC lacked a meritorious defense. Considering the strong policy favoring resolution on the merits, the Appellate Term, First Department, exercised its discretion to relieve MVAIC of the unintended default. It reversed the order denying vacatur, granted MVAIC's motion, vacated the default judgment and remanded for further proceedings.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Rally Chiropractic, P.C. v MVAIC (2012 NY Slip Op 50325(U))

[*1]
Rally Chiropractic, P.C. v MVAIC
2012 NY Slip Op 50325(U) [34 Misc 3d 153(A)]
Decided on February 28, 2012
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on February 28, 2012
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT

PRESENT: Schoenfeld, J.P., Shulman, Torres, JJ
570850/11.

Rally Chiropractic, P.C. a/a/o Jason Rivera, and Canarsie Medical Health, P.C. a/a/o Jason Rivera, Plaintiffs-Respondents, – –

against

MVAIC, Defendant-Appellant.


Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered August 31, 2010, which denied its motion to vacate a default judgment.


Per Curiam.

Order (Arlene P. Bluth, J.), entered August 31, 2010, reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted, default judgment vacated, and matter remanded for further proceedings.

The record shows that defendant’s failure to appear at the compliance conference resulted from excusable law office failure, and that defense counsel’s miscalendaring of the initial scheduled date was neither willful nor part of a pattern of delay (see The Travelers Ins. Co. v Abelow, 14 AD3d 395 [2005]). Considering the strong policy favoring resolution of cases on the merits (see Chevalier v 368 E. 148th St. Assoc., LLC, 80 AD3d 411, 413-414 [2011]), and in the absence of any argument by plaintiff that the delay caused it prejudice or that defendant lacks a meritorious defense, we exercise our discretion to relieve defendant of its unintended default.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: February 28, 2012

Similar decisions

  • A.B. Med. Servs., PLLC v Motor Veh. Acc. Indem. Corp. (2009 NY Slip Op 52363(U))MVAIC failed to establish a meritorious defense in its initial papers seeking vacatur of the providers' default judgment.
  • Pro-Med Med., P.C. v MVAIC (2018 NY Slip Op 50152(U))MVAIC failed to establish a reasonable excuse or a meritorious defense for vacating its default in answering the provider's complaint.
  • Craniofacial Pain Mgt. v MVAIC (2010 NY Slip Op 51843(U))MVAIC's motion to vacate its default judgment was untimely because it was made more than one year after service of notice of the judgment.
  • Omega Diagnostic Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC (2011 NY Slip Op 50331(U))MVAIC defaulted by failing to submit written opposition to the provider's summary judgment motion, despite counsel's oral opposition.
  • Hands On Physical Therapy Care v MVAIC (2021 NY Slip Op 50576(U))MVAIC's motion to vacate the default judgment was granted because it established a reasonable excuse for its default.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Case Law

  • Search
  • No-Fault AI
  • New Decisions
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Firm, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.