October 27, 2017

Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51456(U))

Headnote

The case involves Professional Health Imaging, P.C. suing State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. as the assignee of Alaur Abdalla. State Farm moved for summary judgment, arguing that Professional Health Imaging failed to appear for scheduled examinations under oath. Professional Health Imaging cross-moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike State Farm's answer and to compel State Farm to respond to discovery demands. The Civil Court granted State Farm's motion and denied Professional Health Imaging's cross motion. On appeal, the Appellate Term affirmed the lower court's decision. The main issue decided was whether Professional Health Imaging failed to comply with the requirement of appearing for scheduled examinations under oath, and the holding was that the lower court's decision was affirmed.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51456(U))

Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51456(U)) [*1]
Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
2017 NY Slip Op 51456(U) [57 Misc 3d 145(A)]
Decided on October 27, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 27, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
NO. 2014-2247 K C

Professional Health Imaging, P.C., as Assignee of Alaur Abdalla, Appellant,

against

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., Respondent.

Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Irena Golodkeyer, Esq.), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Stuart M. Bodoff, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered August 8, 2014. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike defendant’s answer and to compel defendant to respond to discovery demands.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Plaintiff cross-moved for summary judgment or, in the alternative, to strike defendant’s answer and to compel defendant to respond to discovery demands. Plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court granting defendant’s motion and denying plaintiff’s cross motion.

For the reasons stated in Professional Health Imaging, P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (51 Misc 3d 143[A], 2016 NY Slip Op 50698[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2016]), the order is affirmed.


PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 27, 2017