June 7, 2019
Healthline 1, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50919(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/healthline-1-inc-v-allstate-ins-co-2019-ny-slip-op-50919u/
- Decided
- June 7, 2019
- Citation
- 2019 NY Slip Op 50919(U) · 63 Misc 3d 162(A)
- Posture
- Other motion
- Outcome
- Provider prevailed
- Legal questions
- When no-fault interest is tolled (see the maps)
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Healthline 1, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50919(U))
| Healthline 1, Inc. v Allstate Ins. Co. |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 50919(U) [63 Misc 3d 162(A)] |
| Decided on June 7, 2019 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on June 7, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : BERNICE D. SIEGAL, J.P., MICHAEL L. PESCE, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2017-1676 Q C
against
Allstate Insurance Co., Respondent.
Glinkenhouse, Floumanhaft & Queen (Stephen J. Green of counsel), for appellant. Peter C. Merani, P.C. (Samuel Kamara of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Larry Love, J.), entered May 12, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from, granted the branch of a cross motion by defendant seeking to stay the accrual of no-fault statutory interest “between date of settlement and date of judgment.”
ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed, with $30 costs, and the branch of defendant’s cross motion seeking to stay the accrual of no-fault statutory interest “between date of settlement and date of judgment” is denied.
This action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits was settled in open court in 2011. Defendant did not pay the settlement amount, and a judgment was subsequently entered on June 28, 2016, pursuant to CPLR 5003-a. Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court entered May 12, 2017 as granted the branch of a cross motion by defendant seeking to stay the accrual of no-fault statutory interest “between date of settlement and date of judgment.”
For the reasons stated in Seaside Rehabilitation, as Assignee of Evelia Polanco v Allstate Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-1666 Q C], decided [*2]herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is reversed and the branch of defendant’s cross motion seeking to stay the accrual of no-fault statutory interest “between date of settlement and date of judgment” is denied.
SIEGAL, J.P., PESCE and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 07, 2019
Legal questions
A question of no-fault law this decision rules on, from our Legal Questions pages. Bars count the decisions on the question by year and court, coloured by category; circles are this decision and the decisions on the question it cites or that cite it. Point at a bar or circle for details. The categories and summaries are Beynenson Law’s classification, made by a language model and checked by a second reading.
When is 2% no-fault interest tolled because the claimant delayed suing, arbitrating, prosecuting or collecting?
This decision: Interest runs without suspension: the toll was not triggered or the delay was not unreasonable or not the claimant's
Reversed the stay of no-fault interest between the settlement and entry of judgment and denied the insurer's request for it, for the reasons given in a companion decision rejecting such a toll.
Of the 73 decisions on this question in the Second Department courts and the Court of Appeals, 30 (this one included) are in the same category.
Similar decisions
- Seaside Rehabilitation v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50918(U))The insurer failed to justify tolling no-fault interest because it did not show that the provider prevented settlement payment.
- NCT Diagnostics, Inc. v Countrywide Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 52039(U))A sua sponte stay of no-fault interest accrual is not appealable as of right under CCA 1702 (a) (2).
- Metro Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Country Wide Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 52037(U))A sua sponte stay of no-fault interest accrual is not appealable as of right under CCA 1702 (a) (2).
- Biotech Surgical Supply, Inc. v Country Wide Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 52143(U))The provider's appeal from a sua sponte stay of no-fault interest was dismissed because the ruling was not appealable as of right.
- Metro Med. Diagnostics, P.C. v Country-Wide Ins. Co. (2022 NY Slip Op 51248(U))The provider's statutory no-fault interest was improperly tolled after settlement because the insurer did not show any impediment to payment.