• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
  • Services
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Ask No-Fault AI
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Services
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Ask No-Fault AI
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
June 8, 2018

Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50871(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/gentlecare-ambulatory-anesthesia-servs-v-geico-ins-co-2018-ny-slip-op50871u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
June 8, 2018
Citation
2018 NY Slip Op 50871(U) · 59 Misc 3d 153(A)
Posture
Summary judgment
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
EUO no-show
Cite as
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co., 59 Misc 3d 153(A), 2018 NY Slip Op 50871(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2018)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The insurer's cross motion to dismiss the first four causes of action on summary judgment for EUO nonappearance was granted. The Appellate Term, Second Department, affirmed the order, insofar as appealed from, denying the provider's motion on those claims and granting the insurer's cross motion, for the reasons stated in the companion appeal decided the same day, No. 2015-1996 K C.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50871(U))

[*1]
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v GEICO Ins. Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 50871(U) [59 Misc 3d 153(A)]
Decided on June 8, 2018
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on June 8, 2018

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2015-2067 K C
Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D., as Assignee of Jajoute, Marie, Appellant,

against

GEICO Ins. Co., Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Rivkin Radler, LLP (Cheryl F. Korman and Stuart M. Bodoff of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Pamela L. Fisher, J.), entered June 16, 2015. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the branches of plaintiff’s motion seeking summary judgment on the first through fourth causes of action and granted defendant’s cross motion for partial summary judgment dismissing the first through fourth causes of action.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved for partial summary judgment dismissing the first four causes of action on the ground that plaintiff had failed to appear for duly scheduled examinations under oath. Plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court as denied the branches of its motion seeking summary judgment on the first four causes of action and granted defendant’s cross motion.

For the reasons stated in Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. etc., as Assignee of Saint-Louis, Lydia v GEICO Ins. Co. (__ Misc 3d ___, 2018 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. [*2]2015-1996 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 08, 2018

Similar decisions

  • Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Services; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51653(U))The insurer's proof established presumptively timely mailing of EUO notices and the denial, as well as the provider's nonappearances.
  • Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 50770(U))The insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's complaint based on EUO and IME nonappearances was granted.
  • Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51607(U))The insurer failed to establish timely denial mailing, and the provider failed to establish prima facie entitlement to payment.
  • Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs.; Lyonel F. Paul, M.D. v GEICO Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51773(U))An insurer need not state objective reasons for EUO requests to establish summary judgment based on a provider's nonappearance.
  • Gentlecare Ambulatory Anesthesia Servs. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51152(U))The insurer's summary judgment dismissal for EUO nonappearance was affirmed after the provider's mailing challenges were rejected.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Research

  • Search Case Law & Regulations
  • New Decisions
  • Decisions by Court
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations
  • Claim Process & Deadlines
  • Ask No-Fault AI

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Group, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.