December 19, 2017
Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C. v 21 Century Advantage Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51836(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/easy-care-acupuncture-p-c-v-21-century-advantage-ins-co-2017-ny-slip-op51836u/
- Decided
- December 19, 2017
- Citation
- 2017 NY Slip Op 51836(U) · 58 Misc 3d 138(A)
- Posture
- Summary judgment
- Outcome
- Insurer prevailed
- Issues
- Other
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C. v 21 Century Advantage Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51836(U))
| Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C. v 21 Century Advantage Ins. Co. |
| 2017 NY Slip Op 51836(U) [58 Misc 3d 138(A)] |
| Decided on December 19, 2017 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on December 19, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th
JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M.
SOLOMON, JJ
2015-1506 K C
against
21 Century Advantage Ins. Co., Respondent.
Gary Tsirelman, P.C. (Irena Golodkeyer, Esq.), for appellant. Law Offices of Buratti, Rothenberg & Burns (Kenneth F. Popper, Esq.), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Ingrid Joseph, J.), entered March 18, 2015. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Contrary to plaintiff’s argument on appeal, the papers plaintiff submitted in opposition to defendant’s motion for summary judgment did not raise a triable issue of fact (see Sydney Realty, LLC v Desiderio, 17 Misc 3d 137[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 52302[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 9th & 10th Jud Dists 2007]). Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: December 19, 2017
Similar decisions
- Easy Care Acupuncture, P.C. v Ameriprise Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 51794(U))The insurer established timely mailing of EUO scheduling letters and nonappearance at the scheduled EUOs for the six claims on appeal.
- Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v Hartford Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51471(U))The insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's no-fault benefits complaint was denied on appeal.
- Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v 21st Century Indem. Ins. Co. (2015 NY Slip Op 51850(U))The insurer proved timely mailing of fee-schedule denials through office procedures and the provider's receipt of enclosed checks.
- Easy Care Acupuncture, PC v MVAIC (2017 NY Slip Op 51346(U))A failure to deny a claim within 30 days does not preclude a defense that coverage limits have been exhausted.
- Acupuncture Choice, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51822(U))The provider failed to establish entitlement to summary judgment where timely IME nonappearance denials remained unrebutted.