March 6, 2012
Sigma Psychological, P.C. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co. (2012 NY Slip Op 50412(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/sigma-psychological-p-c-v-chubb-indem-ins-co-2012-ny-slip-op50412u/
- Court
- Appellate Term, Second Department
- Decided
- March 6, 2012
- Citation
- 2012 NY Slip Op 50412(U) · 34 Misc 3d 156(A)
- Posture
- Other motion
- Issues
- Discovery and procedure
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Sigma Psychological, P.C. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co. (2012 NY Slip Op 50412(U))
| Sigma Psychological, P.C. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co. |
| 2012 NY Slip Op 50412(U) [34 Misc 3d 156(A)] |
| Decided on March 6, 2012 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : WESTON, J.P., RIOS and ALIOTTA, JJ
2010-567 K C.
against
Chubb Indemnity Ins. Co., Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Johnny Lee Baynes, J.), entered November 17, 2009. The order granted defendant’s motion to vacate a notice of trial and dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 to the extent of vacating the notice of trial and compelling plaintiff to respond to defendant’s discovery demands.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed as academic.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court entered November 17, 2009 which granted defendant’s motion to vacate a notice of trial and dismiss the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3126 to the extent of vacating the notice of trial and compelling plaintiff to respond to defendant’s discovery demands. Subsequent to the entry of the November 17, 2009 order, the Civil Court entered an order dismissing the complaint. The dismissal of the complaint renders this appeal academic (see Livny v Rotella, 305 AD2d 377 [2003]; Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., 15 Misc 3d 131[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 50673[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]; Fair Price Med. Supply Corp. v ELRAC Inc., 13 Misc 3d 33 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists [*2]2006]).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
Weston, J.P., Rios and Aliotta, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: March 06, 2012
Cited in this decision
- Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50673(U))The provider's appeal from an order compelling depositions became academic after the action was dismissed for noncompliance.
- Fair Price Med. Supply Corp. v ELRAC Inc. (2006 NY Slip Op 26350)The provider's appeal from denial of summary judgment and compelled discovery became academic when Civil Court later dismissed the action.
Similar decisions
- Sigma Psychological, P.C. v GEICO (2012 NY Slip Op 50868(U))The insurer's sworn peer review established lack of medical necessity for psychological services, and the provider did not rebut it.
- Kappa Med., P.C. v Chubb Indem. Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51199(U))The insurer's doctor's affidavit failed to establish the assignor's IME nonappearance through personal knowledge or other appropriate proof.
- Queens Brooklyn Med. Rehab, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2011 NY Slip Op 50978(U))The provider's appeal from a conditional discovery order became academic after a subsequent order dismissed the action.
- Axis Chiropractic, PLLC v GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. (2012 NY Slip Op 51702(U))The insurer established timely denials and an unrebutted lack of medical necessity for the chiropractic services at issue.
- Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Maya Assur. Co. (2015 NY Slip Op 50786(U))The insurer failed to establish proper mailing of IME scheduling letters, and the provider failed to establish its prima facie case.