• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
  • Services
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Ask No-Fault AI
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Services
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Ask No-Fault AI
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
October 18, 2019

Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v Global Liberty Ins. (2019 NY Slip Op 51692(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/lidas-med-supply-inc-v-global-liberty-ins-2019-ny-slip-op-51692u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
October 18, 2019
Citation
2019 NY Slip Op 51692(U) · 65 Misc 3d 139(A)
Posture
Summary judgment
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
Other
Cite as
Lida's Med. Supply, Inc. v Global Liberty Ins., 65 Misc 3d 139(A), 2019 NY Slip Op 51692(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The provider's summary judgment motion was denied on appeal, and its judgment for assigned no-fault benefits was reversed. The Appellate Term, Second Department, vacated the portion of the underlying order granting the motion for the reasons stated in the companion appeal decided the same day, No. 2017-2381 K C; it deemed the appeal taken from the ensuing judgment under CPLR 5501 (c).

Reported in New York Official Reports at Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v Global Liberty Ins. (2019 NY Slip Op 51692(U))

[*1]
Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v Global Liberty Ins.
2019 NY Slip Op 51692(U) [65 Misc 3d 139(A)]
Decided on October 18, 2019
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 18, 2019

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2017-2392 K C
Lida’s Medical Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Ruth Seleamy, Respondent,

against

Global Liberty Insurance, Appellant.

Law Office of Jason Tenenbaum, P.C. (Jason Tenenbaum of counsel), for appellant. Law Office of Marina Josovich, P.C. (Marina Josovich of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered May 10, 2017. The order, insofar as appealed from as limited by the brief, granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The notice of appeal from the order is deemed a notice of appeal from a judgment of that court entered December 12, 2017 awarding plaintiff the principal sum of $1,611.92 (see CPLR 5501 [c]).

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, with $30 costs, so much of the order entered May 10, 2017 as granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is vacated and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. By order entered May 10, 2017, the Civil Court, insofar as is relevant, granted plaintiff’s motion. This appeal by defendant ensued. A judgment was subsequently entered on December 12, 2017, from which the appeal is deemed to have been taken (see CPLR 5501 [c]).

For the reasons stated in Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc., as Assignee of Johan Gaston v Global Liberty Ins. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2017-2381 K C], decided herewith), the judgment is reversed, so much of the order entered May 10, 2017 as granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is vacated and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is denied.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 18, 2019

Similar decisions

  • Lidas Med. Supply, Inc. v Global Liberty Ins. (2019 NY Slip Op 51733(U))The provider's summary judgment motion was denied on appeal for failure to establish the required proof concerning claim denial.
  • Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v Hereford Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 51356(U))The provider failed to establish entitlement to payment, and the insurer failed to establish timely mailing of its follow-up IME letter.
  • Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v Park Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 51282(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion based on the assignor's failure to appear for duly scheduled IMEs was granted on appeal.
  • Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v American Ind. Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50502(U))The insurer's motion to dismiss the provider's no-fault complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted on appeal.
  • Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v Personal Serv. Ins. Co. (2022 NY Slip Op 50578(U))The insurer's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted on appeal.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Research

  • Search Case Law & Regulations
  • New Decisions
  • Decisions by Court
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations
  • Claim Process & Deadlines
  • Ask No-Fault AI

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Group, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.