March 23, 2020
Urmas Med., PC v MVAIC (2020 NY Slip Op 50361(U))
Headnote
The provider's motion to compel discovery from MVAIC was upheld on appeal. The Appellate Term, First Department, affirmed the order, insofar as appealed from, for the reasons stated in Precision Chiropractic, PC v MVAIC, the companion appeal decided the same day, No. 20-002.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Urmas Med., PC v MVAIC (2020 NY Slip Op 50361(U))
[*1]| Urmas Med., PC v MVAIC |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 50361(U) [67 Misc 3d 126(A)] |
| Decided on March 23, 2020 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on March 23, 2020
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: Shulman, P.J., Edmead, Torres, JJ.
570015/20
Urmas Medical, PC a/a/o Jamual
Douglas, Plaintiff-Respondent,
against
MVAIC, Defendant-Appellant.
against
MVAIC, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant, as limited by its briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Bronx County (Bianka Perez, J.), entered March 20, 2019, as granted plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery.
Per Curiam.
Order (Bianka Perez, J.), entered March 20, 2019, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs (see Precision Chiropractic, PC v MVAIC, appeal numbered 20-002, decided herewith).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: March 23, 2020