March 26, 2007

Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50605(U))

Headnote

The court considered the fact that Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. was seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, and had moved for summary judgment. The main issue decided was whether the affidavit submitted by plaintiff's corporate officer laid a proper foundation for the documents annexed to plaintiff's moving papers, and whether this constituted a prima facie case. The holding of the court was that the affidavit was insufficient to establish that the officer possessed personal knowledge of plaintiff's practices and procedures, and therefore did not lay a proper foundation for the documents. As a result, plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment, and the judgment in their favor was reversed, the order was vacated, and plaintiff's motion for summary judgment was denied.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50605(U))

Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50605(U)) [*1]
Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
2007 NY Slip Op 50605(U) [15 Misc 3d 129(A)]
Decided on March 26, 2007
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on March 26, 2007

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and RIOS, JJ
2006-293 K C.
Vista Surgical Supplies, Inc. a/a/o Anolina Medina, Respondent,

against

Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (George J. Silver, J.), entered December 8, 2005, deemed an appeal from a judgment entered on January 5, 2006 (see CPLR 5501 [c]). The judgment, entered pursuant to the December 8, 2005 order granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, awarded plaintiff the principal sum of $2,354.

Judgment reversed without costs, order entered December 8, 2005 vacated, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. The court below granted the motion and the instant appeal by defendant ensued.

On appeal, defendant raises for the first time that the affidavit by plaintiff’s corporate officer, submitted in support of the motion, failed to lay a proper foundation for the documents annexed to plaintiff’s moving papers and that, as a result, plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case. The affidavit submitted by plaintiff’s corporate officer was insufficient to establish that said officer possessed personal knowledge of plaintiff’s practices and procedures so as to lay a foundation for the admission, as business records, of the documents annexed to plaintiff’s moving papers. Accordingly, plaintiff failed to make a prima facie showing of its entitlement to summary judgment (see Bath Med. Supply, Inc. v Deerbrook Ins. Co., 14 Misc 3d 135[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 50179[U] [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]; Dan Med., P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. [*2]Fire Ins. Co., 14 Misc 3d 44 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2006]). Consequently, the judgment is reversed, the order entered December 8, 2005 is vacated, and plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment denied.

Pesce, P.J., Golia and Rios, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: March 26, 2007