October 13, 2016

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co. (2016 NY Slip Op 51533(U))

Headnote

The relevant facts the court considered in this case were that TAM Medical Supply Corp. was seeking to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits and the Civil Court denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment while granting the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The main issues decided were whether the provider could recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits and whether the defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should be granted or denied. The holding of the case was that defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied, and the order is affirmed, without costs.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Tam Med. Supply Corp. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co. (2016 NY Slip Op 51533(U))

Tam Med. Supply Corp. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co. (2016 NY Slip Op 51533(U)) [*1]
TAM Med. Supply Corp. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co.
2016 NY Slip Op 51533(U) [53 Misc 3d 142(A)]
Decided on October 13, 2016
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on October 13, 2016

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ.
2014-638 Q C
TAM Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of JOEL JACQUEZ, Appellant,

against

National Liability & Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Carmen R. Velasquez, J.), entered March 4, 2014. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in TAM Med. Supply Corp., as Assignee of Melisa Abdoul v National Liability & Fire Ins. Co. (____ Misc 3d _____, 2016 NY Slip Op ______ [appeal No. 2014-635 Q C], decided herewith), the order is modified by providing that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.

Pesce, P.J., Aliotta and Solomon, JJ., concur.


Decision Date: October 13, 2016