• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
    • Search
    • No-Fault AI
    • New Decisions
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
October 18, 2019

Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 51682(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/right-aid-med-supply-corp-v-mvaic-2019-ny-slip-op-51682u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
October 18, 2019
Citation
2019 NY Slip Op 51682(U) ยท 65 Misc 3d 137(A)
Posture
Summary judgment
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
Discovery and procedure
Cite as
Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v MVAIC, 65 Misc 3d 137(A), 2019 NY Slip Op 51682(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The provider's challenges to MVAIC's summary judgment motion were unpreserved because they were raised for the first time on appeal. The provider appealed from an order granting MVAIC summary judgment dismissing its action for assigned first-party no-fault benefits. The Appellate Term, Second Department, declined to consider any of the provider's arguments for denying the motion, following Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc. and Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen. It affirmed the order dismissing the complaint in MVAIC's favor.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 51682(U))

[*1]
Right Aid Med. Supply Corp. v MVAIC
2019 NY Slip Op 51682(U) [65 Misc 3d 137(A)]
Decided on October 18, 2019
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on October 18, 2019
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2016-2707 K C

Right Aid Medical Supply Corp., as Assignee of Bell, Lamont, Appellant,

against

MVAIC, Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Barbara Carabell of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Richard J. Montelione, J.), entered September 12, 2016. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted a motion by defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

All of plaintiff’s arguments as to why defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied are not properly before this court, since they are being raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to consider them (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]). Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: October 18, 2019

Similar decisions

  • Right Aid Diagnostic Medicine, P.C. v MVAIC (2016 NY Slip Op 51438(U))A provider aware of the vehicle owner's identity must exhaust remedies against that owner before seeking benefits from MVAIC. The provider and assignor knew the owner of the vehicle in which the assignor had been a passenger at the time of the accident.
  • A.C. Med., P.C. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 51698(U))A provider must exhaust remedies against all potential insurance carriers before seeking assigned no-fault benefits from MVAIC. The provider appealed an order granting MVAIC summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denying the provider's cross motion for summary judgment.
  • Active Care Med. Supply Corp. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 52058(U))MVAIC's summary judgment motion based on outstanding verification was denied, and the provider's cross motion for summary judgment was granted.
  • Lida’s Med. Supply, Inc. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 51618(U))MVAIC established that no timely sworn notice to make claim was filed, defeating a condition precedent to no-fault benefits.
  • TAM Med. Supply Corp. v MVAIC (2017 NY Slip Op 51725(U))MVAIC established that the provider had not timely filed the notice-of-intention affidavit required for no-fault payment.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Case Law

  • Search
  • No-Fault AI
  • New Decisions
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Firm, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.