July 10, 2008

North N.Y. Med. Care, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 51557(U))

Headnote

The court considered the fact that the insurance company was required to pay or deny a claim for no-fault benefits within 30 days of receiving the proof of claim. The insurance company requested additional verification 12 business days after receiving the claim form, reducing the 30-day period to 28 days. The insurance company received the requested verification on May 16, 2001, and was required to pay or deny the claim at issue on or before June 13, 2001. However, the insurance company did not deny the claim until June 14, 2001, making the denial untimely and precluding the insurance company from raising its defense of lack of medical necessity. As a result, the court granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment upon the unpaid portion of the claim and remanded the case for the calculation of interest and attorney's fees. The relevant issue was whether the insurance company's denial of the claim was untimely, and the holding was in favor of the plaintiff, granting summary judgment and remanding for further calculations.

Reported in New York Official Reports at North N.Y. Med. Care, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 51557(U))

North N.Y. Med. Care, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 51557(U)) [*1]
North N.Y. Med. Care, P.C. v New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2008 NY Slip Op 51557(U) [20 Misc 3d 138(A)]
Decided on July 10, 2008
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on July 10, 2008

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

APPELLATE TERM: 9th and 10th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : RUDOLPH, P.J., McCABE and SCHEINKMAN, JJ
2007-992 N C.
North New York Medical Care, P.C. a/a/o MILEDY CORNIEL, Appellant,

against

New York Central Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Respondent.

Appeal from an order of the District Court of Nassau County, Third District (Norman Janowitz, J.), dated May 14, 2007. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment as to the sum of $1,937.58, representing an unpaid balance of a February 15, 2001 no-fault insurance claim.

Order, insofar as appealed from, reversed without costs, plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment upon the $1,937.58 unpaid portion of its claim dated February 15, 2001 granted and matter remanded to the court below for the calculation of statutory interest and an assessment of attorney’s fees thereon.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff moved for summary judgment. Insofar as is relevant to this appeal, the court below denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment upon the unpaid $1,937.58 balance of its NF-3 claim form dated February 15, 2001 on the ground that defendant raised an issue of fact as to medical necessity. This appeal by plaintiff ensued.

An insurance carrier is required to either pay or deny a claim for no-fault benefits within 30 days of the date the insurer receives the proof of claim (see Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65.15 [g] [3], now Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.8; Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas. Co., 90 NY2d 274 [1997]). Insurance [*2]Department Regulations (11 NYCRR) § 65.15 (d) (2) provides that additional verification required by an insurer is to be requested within 10 business days of receipt of a prescribed claim form. Where, as here, defendant requested additional verification 12 business days after receiving plaintiff’s NF-3 claim form, the 30-day period within which defendant was required to pay or deny plaintiff’s claim was correspondingly reduced to 28 days (Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65.15 [g] [10], now Insurance Department Regulations [11 NYCRR] § 65-3.8 [j]; see Hospital for Joint Diseases v Travelers Prop. Cas. Ins. Co., 9 NY3d 312, 318 [2007]). Since defendant concedes that it received the requested verification on May 16, 2001, defendant was required to pay or deny the claim at issue on or before June 13, 2001. As defendant did not deny plaintiff’s claim until June 14, 2001, defendant’s denial of plaintiff’s claim was untimely and defendant is precluded from raising its proffered defense of lack of medical necessity (see Presbyterian Hosp. in City of N.Y. v Maryland Cas. Co., 90 NY2d 274 [1997], supra).

Accordingly, plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment upon the $1,937.58 unpaid portion of its claim dated February 15, 2001, and the matter is remanded to the court below for the calculation of statutory interest and an assessment of attorney’s fees thereon pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (a) and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Rudolph, P.J., McCabe and Scheinkman, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: July 10, 2008