January 29, 2009

Marigliano v New York Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2009 NY Slip Op 50137(U))

Headnote

The denial of the insurer's motion to revise the provider's attorney's-fee award was affirmed on appeal. The Appellate Term, First Department, relied on the reasons stated by the Civil Court, New York County. The decision also cited LMK Psychological Servs. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. without further explanation.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Marigliano v New York Mut. Fire Ins. Co. (2009 NY Slip Op 50137(U))

[*1]
Marigliano v New York Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2009 NY Slip Op 50137(U) [22 Misc 3d 131(A)]
Decided on January 29, 2009
Appellate Term, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.
Decided on January 29, 2009

APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT


PRESENT: McKeon, P.J., Schoenfeld, Heitler, JJ
570025/08.
Adam Marigliano, LMT, a/a/o Santos Climaco, Jose Contreras Rutreyes, Visitacion Corado, Jorge Acosta, Jessica Acosta, Horacio Velasquez, Ana Corado, and Maria Guzman, Plaintiff-Respondent,

against

New York Mutual Fire Insurance Co., Defendant-Appellant.

Defendant appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered March 14, 2007, which denied its motion to “revise” the award of attorney’s fees issued to plaintiff in this first party no-fault benefits action.

Per Curiam.
Order (Shlomo S. Hagler, J.), entered March 14, 2007 affirmed, with $10 costs, for the reasons stated by Shlomo S. Hagler, J., at Civil Court. (See 15 Misc 3d 766 2007). (See also LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 46 AD3d 1290, 1292 [2007], lv granted 10 NY3d 717 [2008].)

THIS CONSTITUTES THE ORDER OF THE COURT.
Decision Date: January 29, 2009

Cited in this decision

Similar decisions