November 13, 2020
Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/island-life-chiropractic-pain-care-pllc-v-nationwide-ins-2020-ny-slip-op51359u/
- Decided
- November 13, 2020
- Citation
- 2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U) · 69 Misc 3d 142(A)
- Posture
- Summary judgment
- Outcome
- Insurer prevailed
- Issues
- Other
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U))
| Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins. |
| 2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U) [69 Misc 3d 142(A)] |
| Decided on November 13, 2020 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on November 13, 2020
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2018-2043 K C
against
Nationwide Ins., Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Hollander Legal Group , P.C. (Allan S. Hollander of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered July 20, 2018. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.
All of plaintiff’s arguments as to why defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied are not properly before this court, since they are being raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to consider them (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
ALIOTTA, P.J., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 13, 2020
Similar decisions
- Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Ameriprise Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51369(U))The insurer established the assignor's failure to attend both scheduled EUOs and timely denials based on that nonappearance.
- Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v 21st Century Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51824(U))The provider failed to establish that its claims were denied late or that timely denials were conclusory, vague or legally meritless.
- Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51769(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion dismissing the provider's no-fault claims for failure to attend scheduled EUOs was granted.
- Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51843(U))The insurer failed to prove mailing of IME notices, and the provider failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.
- Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2016 NY Slip Op 51541(U))The insurer's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's claims as premature for outstanding verification was denied on appeal.