• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
  • Services
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Ask No-Fault AI
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Services
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Ask No-Fault AI
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Award Volume
    • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Carrier Data
    • Provider / Attorney Data
    • Arbitration Pro Extension
  • About Us
  • Contact
November 13, 2020

Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/island-life-chiropractic-pain-care-pllc-v-nationwide-ins-2020-ny-slip-op51359u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
November 13, 2020
Citation
2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U) · 69 Misc 3d 142(A)
Posture
Summary judgment
Outcome
Insurer prevailed
Issues
Other
Cite as
Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins., 69 Misc 3d 142(A), 2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2020)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The provider's challenges to the insurer's summary judgment motion were unpreserved because they were raised for the first time on appeal. In this action for assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court granted the insurer's motion dismissing the complaint and denied the provider's cross motion for summary judgment. The Appellate Term, Second Department, declined to consider all of the provider's arguments for denying the insurer's motion and affirmed the order.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U))

[*1]
Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Nationwide Ins.
2020 NY Slip Op 51359(U) [69 Misc 3d 142(A)]
Decided on November 13, 2020
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on November 13, 2020

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., DAVID ELLIOT, BERNICE D. SIEGAL, JJ
2018-2043 K C
Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC, as Assignee of Pollen, Faith, Appellant,

against

Nationwide Ins., Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Hollander Legal Group , P.C. (Allan S. Hollander of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered July 20, 2018. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied plaintiff’s cross motion for summary judgment.

All of plaintiff’s arguments as to why defendant’s motion for summary judgment should have been denied are not properly before this court, since they are being raised for the first time on appeal, and we decline to consider them (see Joe v Upper Room Ministries, Inc., 88 AD3d 963 [2011]; Gulf Ins. Co. v Kanen, 13 AD3d 579 [2004]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

ALIOTTA, P.J., ELLIOT and SIEGAL, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: November 13, 2020

Similar decisions

  • Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v Ameriprise Ins. (2020 NY Slip Op 51369(U))The insurer established the assignor's failure to attend both scheduled EUOs and timely denials based on that nonappearance.
  • Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v 21st Century Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51824(U))The provider failed to establish that its claims were denied late or that timely denials were conclusory, vague or legally meritless.
  • Island Life Chiropractic Pain Care, PLLC v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51769(U))The insurer's summary judgment motion dismissing the provider's no-fault claims for failure to attend scheduled EUOs was granted.
  • Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v National Liab. & Fire Ins. Co. (2017 NY Slip Op 51843(U))The insurer failed to prove mailing of IME notices, and the provider failed to establish its prima facie entitlement to summary judgment.
  • Island Life Chiropractic, P.C. v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2016 NY Slip Op 51541(U))The insurer's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's claims as premature for outstanding verification was denied on appeal.
Beynenson Law

Tech-driven New York no-fault collections for healthcare providers.

About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Research

  • Search Case Law & Regulations
  • New Decisions
  • Decisions by Court
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations
  • Claim Process & Deadlines
  • Ask No-Fault AI

Arbitration Data

  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Award Volume
  • Arbitrator / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Carrier Data
  • Provider / Attorney Data
  • Arbitration Pro Extension

©2026 The Beynenson Law Group, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.