October 8, 2008
Devonshire Surgical Facility v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 52015(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/devonshire-surgical-facility-v-nationwide-mut-ins-co-2008-ny-slip-op52015u/
- Decided
- October 8, 2008
- Citation
- 2008 NY Slip Op 52015(U) · 21 Misc 3d 130(A)
- Posture
- Summary judgment
- Outcome
- Provider prevailed
- Issues
- Other
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at Devonshire Surgical Facility v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 52015(U))
| Devonshire Surgical Facility v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 52015(U) [21 Misc 3d 130(A)] |
| Decided on October 8, 2008 |
| Appellate Term, First Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
APPELLATE TERM OF THE SUPREME COURT, FIRST DEPARTMENT
PRESENT: McKEON, P.J., SCHOENFELD, HEITLER, JJ
570389/07.
against
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant, as limited by the briefs, appeals from so much of an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Barbara Jaffe, J.), dated January 24, 2006, as granted plaintiff Devonshire Surgical Facility summary judgment in the principal sum of $3,000, and granted plaintiff Carnegie Hill Orthopedic Services partial summary judgment in the principal sum of $41,157.88.
Per Curiam.
Appeal from order (Barbara Jaffe, J.), dated January 24, 2006, dismissed, without costs.
In view of plaintiffs’ unrefuted showing that the notice of appeal from the January 24, 2006 order was not filed within 30 days of the service of the order with notice of entry, it was untimely and the appeal must therefore be dismissed (see CPLR 5513[a]; Steinhardt Group, Inc. v Citicorp, 303 AD2d 326 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 506 [2003]). Were the appeal properly before us, we would affirm. Plaintiffs established prima case their entitlement to first party no-fault benefits and defendant failed to raise a triable issue to defeat summary judgment.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concurI concurI concur
Decision Date: October 08, 2008
Similar decisions
- Devonshire Surgical Facility v American Tr. Ins. Co. (2011 NY Slip Op 50513(U))The insurer's conclusory peer review report failed to raise a triable issue concerning medical necessity.
- Devonshire Surgical Facility v GEICO (2007 NY Slip Op 51308(U))The insurer raised licensing issues as to the surgical facility but was precluded from asserting fraudulent billing against the orthopedic provider.
- Devonshire Surgical Facility, LLC v Allstate Ins. Co. (2012 NY Slip Op 52351(U))The provider's cross motion failed because factual issues remained over billing rates applicable to its apparent surgical facility status.
- Devonshire Surgical Facility, L.L.C. v Hereford Ins. Co. (2010 NY Slip Op 52297(U))The Workers' Compensation Board must first resolve the factual question whether the assignor's loss falls under the Workers' Compensation Law. The insurer alleged that the loss occurred during employment, and its submissions raised a factual issue concerning workers' compensation coverage.
- Fortune Med., P.C. v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50497(U))The provider's deficient business-records foundation defeated summary judgment, and its default barred review of the discovery ruling.