July 14, 2017

Compas Med., P.C. v ELRAC, Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 50927(U))

Headnote

The defendant's affidavits established timely mailing of the IME scheduling letters and denial of claim form. The provider sought assigned first-party no-fault benefits, and the Civil Court, Queens County, granted summary judgment dismissing the complaint based on the assignor's failure to appear for duly scheduled IMEs. The Appellate Term, Second Department, rejected the provider's challenge to the mailing proof and affirmed the order in the defendant's favor.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Compas Med., P.C. v ELRAC, Inc. (2017 NY Slip Op 50927(U))

[*1]
Compas Med., P.C. v ELRAC, Inc.
2017 NY Slip Op 50927(U) [56 Misc 3d 132(A)]
Decided on July 14, 2017
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.


Decided on July 14, 2017
SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS

PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, MARTIN M. SOLOMON, JJ
2014-1587 Q C

Compas Medical, P.C., as Assignee of Moise, Joery, Appellant,

against

ELRAC, Inc., Respondent.


The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell, Esq.), for appellant. Lawrence N. Rogak, LLC (Lawrence N. Rogak, Esq.), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Jodi Orlow, J.), entered June 23, 2014. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, the Civil Court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that defendant had timely and properly denied the claim at issue based upon plaintiff’s assignor’s failure to appear for duly scheduled independent medical examinations (IMEs).

Contrary to plaintiff’s arguments on appeal, the affidavits submitted by defendant in support of its motion were sufficient to demonstrate that the IME scheduling letters and the denial of claim form had been timely mailed (see St. Vincent’s Hosp. of Richmond v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 50 AD3d 1123 [2008]; Delta Diagnostic Radiology, P.C. v Chubb Group of Ins., 17 Misc 3d 16 [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]).

Accordingly, the order is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: July 14, 2017