• 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
Beynenson Law
Beynenson Law
    • No-Fault Collections
    • Billing and Collections
    • Provider Defense
  • How We Work
  • About
    • All Research & Data
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Arbitration Results by Provider
    • Ask No-Fault AI
  • Contact
  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
    • No-Fault Collections
    • Billing and Collections
    • Provider Defense
  • How We Work
  • About
    • All Research & Data
    • Search Case Law & Regulations
    • New Decisions
    • Decisions by Court
    • Legal Questions
    • No-Fault Regulations
    • Claim Process & Deadlines
    • Arbitrator Scorecard
    • Arbitration Results by Provider
    • Ask No-Fault AI
  • Contact
May 10, 2019

Blackman v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50750(U))

https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/blackman-v-allstate-ins-co-2019-ny-slip-op-50750u/

Court
Appellate Term, Second Department
Decided
May 10, 2019
Citation
2019 NY Slip Op 50750(U) · 63 Misc 3d 151(A)
Posture
Summary judgment
Outcome
Split result
Issues
Other
Cite as
Blackman v Allstate Ins. Co., 63 Misc 3d 151(A), 2019 NY Slip Op 50750(U) (App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2019)

Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.

Summary

Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.

The insurer's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's assigned no-fault claims was denied on appeal. The Appellate Term, Second Department, modified the order while leaving the provider's summary judgment motion denied. It relied on the reasons stated in companion appeal Metro Psychological Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co., No. 2016-2907 K C, decided the same day.

Reported in New York Official Reports at Blackman v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50750(U))

[*1]
Blackman v Allstate Ins. Co.
2019 NY Slip Op 50750(U) [63 Misc 3d 151(A)]
Decided on May 10, 2019
Appellate Term, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports.

Decided on May 10, 2019

SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE TERM, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 2d, 11th and 13th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS


PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2016-2999 K C
Noel E. Blackman, M.D., as Assignee of Levent, Emek, Appellant,

against

Allstate Insurance Company, Respondent.

The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Peter C. Merani, P.C. (Eric M. Wahrburg of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Devin P. Cohen, J.), entered August 23, 2016. The order denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order is modified by providing that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs.

In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and granted defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

For the reasons stated in Metro Psychological Servs., P.C., as Assignee of Adams Kenneth v Allstate Ins. Co. (___ Misc 3d ___, 2019 NY Slip Op _____ [appeal No. 2016-2907 K C], decided herewith), the order is modified by providing that defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint is denied.


PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 10, 2019

Similar decisions

  • Blackman v State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. (2018 NY Slip Op 51606(U))The insurer established proper mailing of EUO scheduling letters and the assignor's failure to appear for the scheduled EUOs. The provider appealed an order granting the insurer summary judgment dismissing its assigned first-party no-fault benefits complaint on EUO nonappearance grounds.
  • Metro Psychological Servs., P.C. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50748(U))The insurer failed to establish timely mailing of its denials, and the provider failed to establish entitlement to payment as a matter of law.
  • Blackman v 21st Century Ins. Co. (2021 NY Slip Op 50771(U))The provider's claims were barred by res judicata based on a declaratory judgment of which the appellate court took judicial notice.
  • Blackman v Hereford Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 51166(U))The provider's affidavit raised a triable issue as to whether requested verification had been mailed to and received by the insurer.
  • Parisien v Allstate Ins. Co. (2019 NY Slip Op 50745(U))The insurer's motion for summary judgment dismissing the provider's assigned no-fault claims was denied, and that denial was affirmed.
Beynenson Law

No-fault collections for healthcare providers across New York State, with billing available together with collections.

Request a free claims review
About the firm

Contact

  • East Hampton, New York

  • 347-746-6001
  • contact@beynensonlaw.com
  • Contact form

Services

  • No-Fault Collections
  • Billing and Collections
  • Provider Defense

Research & Data

  • All Research & Data
  • Search Case Law & Regulations
  • New Decisions
  • Decisions by Court
  • Legal Questions
  • No-Fault Regulations
  • Claim Process & Deadlines
  • Arbitrator Scorecard
  • Arbitration Results by Provider
  • Ask No-Fault AI

©2026 The Beynenson Law Group, PC. Terms of Use Privacy Policy

Site by khrystev.dev

Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. This website provides general information, not legal advice, and using it does not create an attorney-client relationship. Do not send confidential information through this site.