February 26, 2007
563 Grand Med., P.C. v State-Wide Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50362(U))
https://www.beynensonlaw.com/case-law/563-grand-med-p-c-v-state-wide-ins-co-2007-ny-slip-op-50362u/
- Decided
- February 26, 2007
- Citation
- 2007 NY Slip Op 50362(U) · 14 Misc 3d 142(A)
- Posture
- Article 75 petition
- Outcome
- Insurer prevailed
Posture, outcome, issues and treatment by other decisions are Beynenson Law’s classification. Treatment labels are assigned by a language model reading the citing decision; negative and appeal-history labels are checked by a second reader.
Summary
Editorial summary by Beynenson Law, not part of the court’s decision.
Reported in New York Official Reports at 563 Grand Med., P.C. v State-Wide Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50362(U))
| 563 Grand Med., P.C. v State-Wide Ins. Co. |
| 2007 NY Slip Op 50362(U) [14 Misc 3d 142(A)] |
| Decided on February 26, 2007 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| As corrected in part through November 4, 2011; it will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE TERM: 2nd and 11th JUDICIAL DISTRICTS
PRESENT: : PESCE, P.J., GOLIA and BELEN, JJ
2005-1211 K C.
against
State-Wide Insurance Company, Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin S. Garson, J.), entered May 27, 2005. The order denied the petition to vacate a master arbitrator’s award.
Order modified by adding thereto a provision confirming the master arbitrator’s award; as so modified, affirmed without costs.
Upon a review of the record, we find a rational basis for the determination of the master arbitrator upholding the arbitrator’s award which denied the petitioner’s claim for first-party no-fault benefits (see Matter of Petrofsky [Allstate Ins. Co.], 54 NY2d 207 [1981]). Accordingly, the court below properly denied the petition to vacate the master
arbitrator’s award. However, upon denying the petition, the court was required, pursuant to CPLR 7511 (e), to confirm the award (see Matter of Exclusive Med. & Diagnostic v Government Empls. Ins. Co., 306 AD2d 476 [2003]).
We note that a special proceeding should terminate in a judgment, not an order (see CPLR 411).
Pesce, P.J., Golia and Belen, JJ., concur.
Decision Date: February 26, 2007
Similar decisions
- 563 Grand Med., P.C. v Progressive Northeastern Ins. Co. (2008 NY Slip Op 50090(U))A no-fault arbitrator may raise any issue the arbitrator deems relevant under 11 NYCRR 65-4.4 (e) and 65-4.5 (o).
- 563 Grand Med., P.C. v Nationwide Ins. Co. (2009 NY Slip Op 51493(U))The provider's arbitration-vacatur petition failed because its sole supporting document was not affirmed under penalties of perjury.
- SP Med., P.C. v General Assur. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 52452(U))The provider's petition to vacate the master arbitrator's award was denied because the record supplied a rational basis for the award.
- S.P. Med. Ctr. v Allstate Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 51978(U))An award must be confirmed under CPLR 7511 (e) when a petition to vacate it is denied.
- Superior Med. Equip. v Hudson Ins. Co. (2007 NY Slip Op 50411(U))A court denying a petition to vacate a master arbitrator's award must confirm the award under CPLR 7511 (e).