May 3, 2019
JCC Med., P.C. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 50676(U))
Headnote
Reported in New York Official Reports at JCC Med., P.C. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 50676(U))
[*1]| JCC Med., P.C. v MVAIC |
| 2019 NY Slip Op 50676(U) [63 Misc 3d 145(A)] |
| Decided on May 3, 2019 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on May 3, 2019
PRESENT: : MICHAEL L. PESCE, P.J., THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, DAVID ELLIOT, JJ
2016-1556 K C
against
MVAIC, Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Marshall & Marshall, PLLC (Tracy Bader Pollak of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Steven Z. Mostofsky, J.), entered May 3, 2016. The order granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Civil Court which granted a motion by defendant Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (sued herein as MVAIC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Since MVAIC established that there had been no timely filing of a notice to make claim (see Insurance Law § 5208 [a]), plaintiff’s assignor is not a “covered person” (Insurance Law § 5221 [b] [2]). Thus, a condition precedent to plaintiff’s right to apply for payment of no-fault benefits from defendant has not been satisfied (see M.N.M. Med. Health Care, P.C. v MVAIC, 22 Misc 3d 128[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50041[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2009]; Bell Air Med. Supply, LLC v MVAIC, 16 Misc 3d 135[A], 2007 NY Slip Op 51607[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d & 11th Jud Dists 2007]). In opposition to MVAIC’s motion, plaintiff [*2]failed to establish that leave had been obtained to file a late notice of claim or otherwise raise a triable issue of fact (see Insurance Law § 5208 [c]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: May 03, 2019
Cited in this decision
Similar decisions
- New Millennium Med. Imaging, P.C. v MVAIC (2017 NY Slip Op 51833(U))
- Jamhil Med., P.C. v MVAIC (2012 NY Slip Op 51650(U))
- Longevity Med. Supply, Inc. v MVAIC (2019 NY Slip Op 51276(U))
- Five Boro Psychological Servs., P.C. v MVAIC (2012 NY Slip Op 50878(U))
- East Gun Hill Med., P.C. v MVAIC (2015 NY Slip Op 50398(U))